Updated: who buys company data, October 2026 →
Have an offer? Compare itMethodology
Comparison

SimpleClosure (AssetHub) vs Sunset

Compare SimpleClosure (AssetHub) and Sunset using their published programs, payment descriptions and unresolved terms.

Updated 19 October 2026 · Sources and methodology

The practical distinction

SimpleClosure (AssetHub) is classified here as wind-down specialist; Sunset is classified as wind-down specialist. These classifications describe the reviewed public program, not a promise about the counterparty or rights in a future agreement. Verify those details in the proposal.

Public-source comparison; no ranking or recommendation
FieldSimpleClosure (AssetHub)Sunset
Business modelWind-down specialistWind-down specialist
Records describedProprietary source code; Repository and testing history; Technical documentation; Workspace communications; Documents and designs; Project tickets and workflowsInternal communications; Product specifications; Code repositories; Engineering workflows; Customer interactions; Decision and iteration history
EligibilityStartups with qualifying SourceCode or WorkspaceData assets, including companies still operating. The official FAQ says a business does not need to shut down to use AssetHub.Startups winding down that have authentic, usable records of how their teams worked. Sunset evaluates whether the dataset qualifies; no universal size threshold is stated.
PaymentThe official FAQ describes no upfront cost and a success-based percentage on a completed sale or license. It does not publish a universal fee percentage or payment timetable.An outright dataset purchase rather than waiting for the owner to find downstream buyers. The official article does not publish a standard payout amount, payment deadline or fee schedule.
Open questions
  • Confirm the success-fee percentage, actual contracting buyer, retained rights and payment deadline.
  • Reported transaction ranges describe other assets, not an offer or guarantee for your company.
  • Clarify whether the proposed transaction transfers dataset ownership or licenses specified rights.
  • Confirm price, closing conditions, wind-down service charges and which obligations remain with the company.

How to use this comparison

Send the same non-confidential scope to each provider if you choose to approach both. Compare guaranteed payment separately from contingent share, and use the same record dates, exclusions and permitted uses. Public program descriptions can change, and unpublished terms cannot be inferred from a competitor.

What this comparison cannot tell you

Neither a public range nor the breadth of a provider’s program establishes the value of your archive. Fit, authority, acceptance and negotiated terms require diligence. A larger advertised number would not by itself justify a broader license.

Sources & further reading

Provider statements are attributed claims, not audited outcomes. Reviewed 19 October 2026.

Your next step

See where your company’s data could fit.

  • Begin with a company description, not an export
  • Review systems, retained history and exclusions
  • Compare the terms before sharing records
Already have a proposal? Compare the terms →

Explore your company data estimate

Describe your systems and retained history to get a report with preparation priorities and clear uncertainty.

Get estimate report Receive an informational report by email. No records upload or marketing subscription.