No upfront cost; a percentage is charged on completed sales or licenses. Startups with qualifying assets, including companies still operating. Confirm the final scope and acceptance terms before providing records.
This profile checks the public program and its stated terms. It does not authenticate a particular sender, audit completed deals, or certify security practices. No owner rating or paid-outcome estimate is assigned.
How evidence is checked · Commercial disclosureWhat is SimpleClosure (AssetHub)’s company-data program?
AssetHub assesses startup assets, prepares them and connects them with buyers for a sale or license. The platform is part of SimpleClosure's wider company-shutdown services. Official program ↗
Who is the counterparty?
SimpleClosure (AssetHub) is categorized here as wind-down specialist. This describes the published route, not necessarily the entity that trains an AI model. Confirm the contracting company, its authority to license the records and the ultimate permitted recipients. A real company can still be impersonated; reach its program through the official source linked here.
Which records does it describe?
Proprietary source code, Repository and testing history, Technical documentation, Workspace communications, Documents and designs, Project tickets and workflows. Official program ↗
What does that mean for your archive?
Map these categories to the systems and date ranges your company actually retains. Include linked decisions and outcomes where available, but identify customer restrictions, personal information, third-party content and privileged material separately. A match with a listed category is a reason to ask about eligibility, not approval to send an export.
Which companies may qualify?
Startups with qualifying SourceCode or WorkspaceData assets, including companies still operating. The official FAQ says a business does not need to shut down to use AssetHub. Official program ↗
How much does SimpleClosure (AssetHub) publish?
Tens to hundreds of thousands for unique assets, per provider (provider-reported facilitated deals). Official program ↗
How should you interpret that figure?
Published bands, illustrative calculators and quoted examples are different types of evidence. None is a guaranteed price for your company. Where no range has been verified, do not fill the gap with another provider’s estimate. Request a written proposal identifying the records, rights, deductions and conditions behind the amount.
When and how is payment described?
The official FAQ describes no upfront cost and a success-based percentage on a completed sale or license. It does not publish a universal fee percentage or payment timetable. Official program ↗
What does this business model mean for an owner?
A closure-related route can combine licensing with broader asset-sale or shutdown services. Separate the data agreement from other engagements, identify who owns the assets at signing, and agree responsibility for preserving access before subscriptions expire.
Which evidence is available, and what is still open?
These labels describe disclosure, not quality scores. “Verify in writing” means this review does not establish the term for your transaction.
| Criterion | Evidence status | Owner check |
|---|---|---|
| Program identity | Official source linked | Use the provider’s own domain to verify the sender and contracting entity. |
| Record fit | Categories described | Proprietary source code, Repository and testing history, Technical documentation. Ask for a bounded scope. |
| Eligibility | Published description | Startups with qualifying SourceCode or WorkspaceData assets, including companies still operating. The official FAQ says a business does not need to shut down to use AssetHub. |
| Price visibility | Attributed public claim | Tens to hundreds of thousands for unique assets, per provider (provider-reported facilitated deals) |
| Payment mechanics | Published description | The official FAQ describes no upfront cost and a success-based percentage on a completed sale or license. It does not publish a universal fee percentage or payment timetable. |
| Exclusivity and downstream rights | Verify in writing | Confirm duration, permitted uses, sublicensing and whether competing licenses are allowed. |
| Acceptance and deletion | Verify in writing | Specify rejection rules, access expiry, retention and deletion of samples and rejected records. |
What is not yet established?
- Confirm the success-fee percentage, actual contracting buyer, retained rights and payment deadline.
- Reported transaction ranges describe other assets, not an offer or guarantee for your company.
How should you start the conversation?
Begin with a non-sensitive description of your company, systems, approximate history and record categories. Ask for the legal entity name and proposed use before providing samples. Use a separately scoped sample with agreed handling terms; a request for broad administrator access deserves a specific explanation and a limited-access alternative.
Questions to resolve before signing
- Which exact records and time periods are included, and which are excluded?
- Who accepts the data, using what test, and by what deadline?
- What amount reaches us after fees and costs, and when is it due?
- Which customers or labs may receive copies, and for which uses?
- Can we license the same records elsewhere, and what happens if no buyer is found?
- How are samples, rejected records and retained copies deleted or restricted?
Which alternatives are worth comparing?
These are comparison routes, not ranked recommendations. Similar program models come first; eligibility and current demand can still differ. Compare the same record scope with each provider.
| Provider / model | Payment | Published figure | Fit to investigate |
|---|---|---|---|
| SimpleClosure (AssetHub)Wind-down specialist | No upfront cost; a percentage is charged on completed sales or licenses | Tens to hundreds of thousands for unique assets, per providerprovider-reported facilitated deals | Startups with qualifying assets, including companies still operating Source ↗ |
| SunsetWind-down specialist | Direct dataset purchase; payment timing and fees unpublished | Not publicly verified | Winding-down startups with authentic, usable operating records Source ↗ |
| AppenDirect licensing | Negotiated fee on acceptance; preparation costs covered | Not publicly verified | Enterprises with operational history; wind-downs considered Source ↗ |
| AvelenceIntermediary | Partner-negotiated milestones; free initial profile | $160K–$500K example: 20 US employees, 10 years of recordscalculator example; not an offer | Retained company records; selected partner sets criteria Source ↗ |
| CorpusDirect licensing | On delivery confirmation; larger deals may use tranches | $100K–$2M+ across published company-size bandsprovider-reported engagement ranges | Enterprise archives; published size examples start at 25 staff Source ↗ |
See all 25 providers side by side · Read the detailed two-provider comparisons
Have a proposal from SimpleClosure (AssetHub)?
Record the amount, scope, payment trigger and open terms in the local comparison worksheet. It organizes the information you enter; it does not value your archive, contact providers or publish individual offers.
Sources & further reading
Provider statements are attributed claims, not audited outcomes. Reviewed 19 October 2026.